Maj. Jeffrey L. Brown, right, arrives at court Monday morning at Camp Henry, South Korea.

Maj. Jeffrey L. Brown, right, arrives at court Monday morning at Camp Henry, South Korea. (T.D. Flack / S&S)

CAMP HENRY, South Korea — A U.S. Army major found guilty of raping one young enlisted servicemember and maintaining a sexual relationship with another was sentenced late Tuesday to four years in prison.

A jury of five officers — four male and one female — found Maj. Jeffrey L. Brown guilty of rape and fraternization earlier in the day, the second day of his two-day court martial.

The jurors, however, found him innocent of sodomy and stripped the words “sexual relations and sodomy” from one of the two specifications of fraternization.

Brown also was found guilty of violating a lawful general order for breaking the military curfew in June. He is to forfeit all pay and allowances and be dismissed from the Army as part of the sentence.

His civilian lawyer, Gary Myers, who co-counseled with Capt. Pia Rogers, said he was unhappy with the outcome.

“I believe this was a gross insufficiency of evidence to convict and that an appeal has a high probability of prevailing,” Myers said after the trial.

The case began Sept. 30, 2003.

Two women testified this week that they spent several hours drinking with Brown before returning to his apartment that night. One woman stated she awoke to Brown having sex with her and the other testified that she had consensual sex with the major later the same night. That woman said her relationship with the major lasted several months and the story came to light when Army criminal investigators queried her earlier this year.

Brown maintained his innocence during an unsworn statement to the court before hearing the sentence. He said he only offered the women — soldiers from his command — a place to stay when he spotted them wandering drunk on the street near his apartment.

“You guys take the bedroom and I’ll crash on the couch,” he said he told the women. “And that was it.”

He said the months-long relationship with one of the women was professional, not sexual, in nature.

“She needed help … honestly, she needed help,” he said.

He said the soldier often visited his office to talk about family problems and the difficulty of living overseas for the first time — “the things that young soldiers face being away from home.”

“I would give her advice,” he said.

During closing arguments much earlier in the day, prosecutor Capt. Trevor Barna said inconsistent statements from the women during testimony could be blamed on the time between the incident and the court-martial.

“Of course there’s going to be some minor” inconsistencies in the recollections, he said.

But, he stressed, one woman did remember waking up to find Brown having sex with her.

“That’s pretty traumatic … that’s something you’re going to remember,” he said.

He also stressed how difficult it must have been for the young women to testify about the details in the open court.

Barna argued the reason one woman maintained a relationship with the major — even after she witnessed him raping her friend — was because he was an older man who showered her with attention and gifts and made her feel good about herself.

Myers told jurors that looking at hard evidence in a case is a “good place to start.” But he said there was no hard evidence in the case.

Where are the nude photos that Brown supposedly took of one woman, Myers asked, and where are the gifts he supposedly gave her?

The evidence “simply does not exist,” he said.

“Look at how the stories change,” he said of the testimony.

The fact that one woman claimed to have been fondled by Brown, found him on top of her drunken, unconscious friend a few minutes later, and then had consensual sex with him the same night was incredulous, he said.

“Does that make sense to you in the real world?” he asked jurors.

He described the woman as a manipulator in the case.

“It’s her storytelling that brings us here,” he said. “The only thing this man has ever done … is help this kid.”

Barna countered that the idea the women came together to create “some grand conspiracy” is ridiculous.

“Why?” he asked the jurors. Why would one woman make up the story and why would the other agree to help “destroy this man?”

“There is no other ‘why’ than it happened,” he said of the allegations.

While it was wrong for the women to drink underage and go to the major’s house that night, “the punishment is not to be raped by the accused.”

This case didn’t involve a violent crime, Barna said, referring to the woman’s testimony on the first day of trial that she had been gang-raped when she was 12. There was no masked man wielding a knife.

But, he argued, Brown did use a weapon.

“Her intoxication … that was his weapon,” he said. “He’s not the masked man. He’s uncloaked … he’s sitting right there.”

Some of Brown’s last statements to the jurors involved his family.

“I’ve got to tell my daughter that Daddy is going to jail for rape,” said Brown, the divorced father of a 16-year-old girl and a 21-year-old son.

Brig. Gen. Timothy McHale, who heads the 19th Theater Support Command, is convening authority in the trial.

Sign Up for Daily Headlines

Sign up to receive a daily email of today's top military news stories from Stars and Stripes and top news outlets from around the world.

Sign Up Now