Hagel's sequestration review points to few good choices
Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel pauses during a news conference at the Pentagon on July 31, 2013. Hagel warned that the Pentagon may have to mothball up to three Navy aircraft carriers and order more sharp reductions in the size of the Army and Marine Corps if Congress does not act to avoid massive budget cuts beginning in 2014.
WASHINGTON — An Army with fewer soldiers than it’s had since 1940. A Navy with eight aircraft carriers. Military retirees losing their civilian government pensions.
Those were some of the most drastic cuts Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel said Wednesday that the Pentagon is being forced to weigh as it struggles with ongoing budget cuts under sequestration. The automatic cuts could slash $500 billion over a decade, including $52 billion from next year’s budget.
The range of options — none of which have been settled on, and many of which would require congressional approval — are contained in a study Hagel ordered in March, the Strategic Choices and Management Review, designed to help the Pentagon navigate the automatic budget cuts.
But even the most draconian cuts outlined in the study still would result in a massive DOD budget shortfall for the next few years, Hagel admitted. It’s up to Congress to help DOD avoid having to make the most damaging budget choices, he said.
“The deep and abrupt spending cuts under sequestration that began on March 1st this year are the law of the land,” he said at a Pentagon press conference. “Sequestration will continue in the absence of an agreement that replaces the Budget Control Act.”
Speaking before the House Armed Services Committee on Thursday, Deputy Defense Secretary Ashton Carter laid the blame for sequestration cuts at the feet of elected officials, and warned them of broader effects on U.S. power.
“It’s purely the collateral damage of political gridlock, and friends and potential enemies around the world are watching our behavior,” Carter said. “To be sure, America will remain the world’s strongest military power, but we’re accepting unnecessary risk.”
Regardless of Congressional action, however, the findings in the SCMR likely lead to a smaller Army by 2019 than current plans called for. With 420,000 to 450,000 active-duty troops, the Army could fulfill the mission required by the recent national defense strategy that redirects the military’s focus to Asia, Hagel said. Plans approved by Congress call for the Army to cut end strength to 490,000 by 2017.
Likewise, the Air Force could cut up to five tactical air squadrons and reduce its C-130 tactical airlift fleet with minimal risk, the review said.
But the cuts could go much deeper if Congress allows sequestration to continue, he said.
Following one possible approach outlined in the SCMR — designed to protect programs like the Joint Strike Fighter and missions such as the long range strike and cyberwar capability — active Army end strength could drop as low as 380,000 troops. Meanwhile, the Marine Corps could drop to 150,000 active-duty troops. Older Air Force bombers would be retired, and the Navy would cut two or three carrier strike groups, Hagel said.
Carter told legislators on Thursday similar end strength cuts has been weighed for all the military services, though he did not specify the potential size of Air Force or Navy end-strength cuts.
“This strategic choice would result in a force that would be technologically dominant, but would be much smaller and able to go fewer places and do fewer things, especially if crises occurred at the same time in different regions of the world,” Hagel said Wednesday at the Pentagon.
On the other hand, Hagel said, troop numbers and the regional power projection could be protected in exchange for severe cuts in modernization, reductions in cyber capabilities and a smaller Special Operations Command.
“Cuts on this scale would, in effect, be a decadelong modernization holiday,” he said. “The military could find its equipment and weapons systems — many of which are already near the end of their service lives — less effective against more technologically advanced adversaries.”
But neither extreme option would allow the Pentagon to fully implement the current defense strategy, Carter said Thursday.
Speaking Thursday to reporters, Pentagon press secretary George Little said sequestration in 2104 could result in “RIFs, involuntary separations, furloughs and other personnel actions … We hope not to have to engage in these arbitrary cuts under sequestration but that’s what we’re forced into by the law as it stands now.”
Although Congress has consistently balked at Pentagon proposals to limit pay increases for troops and impose new or higher costs on retirees for health care, such changes will be necessary under sequestration, Hagel said.
Hagel said DOD could save $50 billion in a decade if Congress would agree to a package of benefit and pay measures that would, among other things:
Cause retirees to increase their use of civilian health insurance instead of Tricare.
Reduce housing allowances and the overseas cost-of-living allowance.
Continue limiting military and civilian pay raises.
Even more sweeping changes could save $100 billion, and might be necessary if sequestration continues, he said. Those include eliminating civilian pensions for retired military personnel serving in civilian government service, ending subsidies for defense commissaries, and restricting the availability of unemployment benefits, he said.
As DOD implements budget cuts, Congress must help it maintain balance, Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. James “Sandy” Winnefeld told House members Thursday.
But based on previous Congressional actions, he said, military leaders now fear that as legislators “begin to understand what these cuts mean in real terms, we’ll end up with amendments that foreclose, bit by bit, the leverage that we need to shape this force strategically, and will funnel us into principally taking the only thing that’s left, and that is readiness, which really has no constituency other than the young soldier, sailor, airman or Marine, putting his or her life on the line for our nations’ security interests.”
Beyond troop and benefit cuts, Hagel said the Pentagon could save $40 billion over the next decade by increasing efficiency and cutting overhead.
Hagel has ordered a 20 percent budget reduction — which he said should result in 20 percent military and civilian staff cuts — in major DOD offices and headquarters. On the chopping block include the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the military service headquarters, combatant command headquarters and defense agencies and field activities.
Under continuing sequestration, more aggressive cuts, including the consolidation of regional combatant commands and defense agency mission cuts, could save $60 billion in total, he said.
The defense chief said that if Congress cannot agree to a way to end sequestration entirely, it should restructure the cuts so they are “backloaded” with the biggest cuts far in the future — giving the Pentagon time for budget-cutting strategies to take cumulative effect.
When it comes to handling the near-term cuts, Hagel indicated the Pentagon is essentially without a plan, despite the SCMR.
“The reality is that cuts to overhead, compensation, and forces generate savings slowly,” he said. “With dramatic reductions in each area, we do reach sequester-level savings — but only towards the end of a 10-year time frame. Every scenario the review examined showed shortfalls in the early years of $30-35 billion.”