China's intervention in pandemic report has undermined trust in WHO

Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director general of the World Health Organization, attends a meeting in Geneva on March 2, 2020.


By THE JAPAN NEWS | YOMIURI Published: April 3, 2021

Stars and Stripes is making stories on the coronavirus pandemic available free of charge. See more staff and wire stories here. Sign up for our daily coronavirus newsletter here. Please support our journalism with a subscription.

The credibility of the World Health Organization's investigation and analysis have been undermined because China was allowed to intervene by co-writing the report. The WHO's reason for existence probably will be questioned anew.

The WHO has released a report on its investigation conducted in the Chinese city of Wuhan into the origin of the novel coronavirus. However, the report failed to clarify the specific route of infection, merely presenting a conventional assessment that it is highly probable that the virus spread via animals.

The report acknowledged that there is a "possibility" that the virus was brought into the country attached to imported frozen foods, as China has claimed, but it states that it is extremely improbable that the virus leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, a theory advocated by the administration of former president Donald Trump.

The investigation and preparation of the report were strongly influenced by the Chinese government from the beginning, and it was expected that conclusions would be drawn in line with China's assertions.

The report was co-written by 17 experts from the WHO and 17 from China. Why was it impossible for the WHO to conduct an independent investigation? The completion of on-site investigations and the release of the report were delayed significantly. The delays might have been due to difficulties in negotiations with China, which made several requests.

WHO Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus admitted that the report was inadequate. He missed the opportunity to restore public trust in the WHO, which has been criticized for being "China-centric." The organization must conduct further investigation on its own.

The world's first confirmed case of the novel coronavirus was reported in Wuhan in December 2019. The WHO report mentions the possibility that the virus had spread several weeks earlier, and it called on China to conduct additional tests on blood samples.

If China complies, it might lead to the identification of the source of the outbreak, but its compliance will not be easy to achieve.

Experts who participated in the investigation testified that China refused to provide raw data on patients in the early stages of the outbreak. Japan, the United States and 12 other countries were critical of the fact that the investigation team "did not have access to complete, original data and samples."

China must take the harsh gaze of the international community seriously. If the country asserts that it is not the origin of the virus, it should actively cooperate with the investigation and submit data.

The WHO needs to be reformed to increase its transparency and credibility, to prevent a recurrence of such a situation and to effectively deal with new outbreaks.

The European Union has called for a new treaty to strengthen international cooperation in sharing information on infectious diseases and securing vaccines. Efforts must be expedited to create a framework to complement the weak authority of the WHO.