Bill aims for dislocation allowance for retirees
March 9, 2003
ARLINGTON, Va. — Rep. Walter Jones, R-N.C., wants to give military retirees the same dislocation allowance pay given to servicemembers when they move from duty station to duty station.
The congressman, a member of the House Armed Services Committee who hails from a district surrounded by military bases, said it’s the least he can do for those who served the nation.
“This is the right thing to do, whether in peacetime or in war,” Jones said. “We ask a great deal of our military men and women, and it’s a way to say thank you.”
Since 1955, active-duty personnel changing duty station have received the dislocation allowance to cover costs to break rental agreements and deposits for utilities or rental security.
In fiscal 2002, the allowance rate ranged from $1,540 for E-5s and below to $3,300 for O-7s and higher. Rates fluctuate depending on servicemembers’ rate and time in service. Retirees aren’t paid the dislocation allowance.
“There is a false belief that retirees don’t need the same salary as civilians for the same position. Therefore some employers offer retirees less wages,” Jones said.
While the tallying has yet to be completed, the cost to pay retirees the allowance could range between $30 million and $50 million a year, said John Weaver, Jones’ legislative director.
In fiscal 2002, 27,400 people retired from the military, down from more than 37,000 in fiscal 2001 and 30,800 in fiscal 2000.
Jones introduced the bill last year, but did so after lawmakers already had haggled over the defense spending. The bill never made it out of committee, Weaver said. The Fleet Reserve Association has voiced support for the bill both years.