As dialogue fails in Venezuela, cracks show in the opposition

Opposition leader Juan Guaido, left, and president of Venezuela Nicolas Maduro.


By JIM WYSS | Miami Herald | Published: September 16, 2019

MIAMI (Tribune News Service) — Juan Guaido, the man that the United States and more than 50 other nations recognize as Venezuela’s legitimate leader, said he offered to step down and make way for a transitional government that would include the armed forces and members of the ruling party as a way to escape a grinding social, political and economic crisis.

But he said that proposal was thwarted when leader Nicolas Maduro “abandoned” negotiations that were taking place in Barbados under the auspices of Norway.

In a press conference Monday, Guaido said his offer — which would have required both men to resign and for the country to hold free, fair and pluralistic elections — would resolve the crisis has forced more than 4 million people to flee the country.

“The regime abandoned the talks,” Guaido said. “We’ve exhausted the dialogue format.”

As Guaido was holding his news conference, Maduro officials were holding meetings with smaller opposition parties, saying they’d reached a series of agreements. Among them is a deal to reform the National Electoral Council and for the ruling United Socialist Party of Venezuela to begin participating in the National Assembly again. That legislative body has been in the hands of the opposition since 2015 and is seen by many in the international community as the last bastion of democracy in the South American nation.

Those announcements are likely a precursor to early legislative elections that might further complicate Guaido’s ability to force Maduro out of office.

Guaido seized the international spotlight in January when he announced that he was constitutionally bound, as head of the Venezuelan congress, to assume the presidency. If new legislative elections sideline him from that role, many of his international backers may lose their legal rationale for supporting him.

It’s unclear what Guaido’s next moves might be. During the first part of the year, the charismatic 35-year-old was able to draw massive crowds, but his ability to rally the masses is waning. And there are signs that the opposition, which had marched behind him, is growing weary.

“The opposition tends to separate into its component parts, and we are seeing clearly again the divisions,” said Phil Gunson, an analyst with the Crisis Group, an international policy think tank.

On one side are the hard-liners who reject all forms of dialogue. On the other are the moderates who support talks. Then there are smaller opposition groups making side-deals with the government and that seem to favor new elections in exchange for “some very nominal concessions,” Gunson said.

On Monday, the government said it had begun the “National Dialogue for Peace” with three minor political groups: Soluciones para Venezuela, Cambiemos and Avanzada Progresista.

Henri Falcon, the head of Avanzada Progresista, ran for president in 2018 against Maduro in a race that the international community dismissed as fraudulent and that most major opposition parties boycotted.

The Barbados talks had progressed in fits and spurts since May, and they were always a risky proposition for Guaido. Many worried that Maduro would use the venue to stall, buy time and ease the pressure on his regime.

“These were fake talks,” said Maria Corina Machado, a former presidential candidate and a longtime critic of dialogue. “That road is definitively closed.”

She also dismissed the meetings taking place with factions of the opposition.

“That’s not the opposition,” she said. “We all know that.”

Washington has struggled with how to deal with the crisis. President Donald Trump and his security advisers have often warned that “all options” are on the table in dealing with Maduro, but the likelihood of a military intervention seems further away than ever — particularly after national security adviser John Bolton, a hawk on Venezuela, was forced out of office last week.

Washington’s “only alternative is to exert more and more pressure, more sanctions and more diplomatic isolation — and so far that hasn’t worked,” Gunson said.

Guaido said it was up to Maduro to explain to his supporters and the armed forces why he was rejecting a deal that would have guaranteed everyone a seat at the table. Monday was the first day of school in Venezuela and the military was called out to quell teacher protests.

Maduro “needs to explain to those soldiers, whom he ordered to repress the teachers of their very own children, why that’s a real solution to this conflict,” Guaido said. “How is that a solution to this nation’s hunger?”

©2019 Miami Herald
Visit Miami Herald at www.miamiherald.com
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

from around the web