Subscribe
Navy Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Jonathan Greenert explains a new concept for Navy coveralls during an all-hands call at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam in Honolulu on Friday, Feb. 6, 2015. He enlisted an aviator from the audience to help him with the presentation.

Navy Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Jonathan Greenert explains a new concept for Navy coveralls during an all-hands call at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam in Honolulu on Friday, Feb. 6, 2015. He enlisted an aviator from the audience to help him with the presentation. (Wyatt Olson/Stars and Stripes)

Navy Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Jonathan Greenert explains a new concept for Navy coveralls during an all-hands call at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam in Honolulu on Friday, Feb. 6, 2015. He enlisted an aviator from the audience to help him with the presentation.

Navy Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Jonathan Greenert explains a new concept for Navy coveralls during an all-hands call at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam in Honolulu on Friday, Feb. 6, 2015. He enlisted an aviator from the audience to help him with the presentation. (Wyatt Olson/Stars and Stripes)

Adm. Jonathan Greenert, chief of naval operations, talks to reporters at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam in Honolulu on Friday, Feb. 6, 2015.

Adm. Jonathan Greenert, chief of naval operations, talks to reporters at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam in Honolulu on Friday, Feb. 6, 2015. (Wyatt Olson/Stars and Stripes)

JOINT BASE PEARL HARBOR-HICKAM, Hawaii — The Navy’s chief of naval operations had some positive news for sailors during an all-hands call Friday about shortened sea deployments — but cautioned later that budget cuts this coming year could jeopardize them.

The USS Carl Vinson is currently in the Arabian Gulf on a nine-and-a-half month deployment, Adm. Jonathan Greenert told about 1,500 sailors seated in a basketball arena. However, its eventual replacement, the USS Theodore Roosevelt, will deploy for more than a month less than that.

“The carrier after that should be on a seven-month deployment,” Greenert said, adding that amphibious groups, submarines and maritime patrols with aircraft are all now down to deployments of seven months or less.

Greenert said the extended deployments resulted from mandatory budget caps enacted by Congress several years ago after lawmakers came to an impasse on spending and taxes.

Those so-called sequestration cuts call for a mandatory reduction of about $1.1 trillion in discretionary spending — which includes defense — from 2013 to 2021.

Lawmakers eventually agreed on a deal allowing higher defense spending for the past two budget cycles, but further cuts are slated for the budget year that begins Oct. 1 unless another deal is hammered out.

That would “probably” lead to more extended deployments, Greenert told reporters during a news conference after the all-hands call, after which he planned to travel to Australia and New Zealand.

“Some would say that’s because we’re going to try to get all this done with less force,” he said. “But really, it’s because we wouldn’t get maintenance done on time. We wouldn’t have enough people in the public ship yards at Pearl Harbor. That work would take longer to do. You may not have overtime authorized.”

That delay in work has a “cascading downward effect,” which means deployed ships would have to stay at sea longer.

He compared the work of modernizing and maintaining ships to a conveyor belt, “and I can’t crank up the speed on this thing. I don’t have the money to do it.”

Greenert was adamant, however, that the sequestration cuts won’t affect the Pacific rebalance.

“Presence in the Pacific won’t change much, because I will invest in that, very much.”

He said his top priorities are the strategic deterrent of ballistic missile-armed submarines and providing forward presence “where it matters, when it matters, in that distribution.”

He said that the 50 ships now forward-deployed in the Pacific will increase to 60 by 2020.

“That will pretty much remain on track regardless of sequester,” he said.

The effects of sequestration cuts will come in shore operations, maintenance, training and modernization, he said.

“So if you’re not on deployment and you come back, you’ll probably shut down, stop flying. I’m sure you’ll be delayed going into maintenance, a smaller maintenance package because of what we can afford. That will affect Hawaii from the perspective of these modernization packages that we bring in. We bring a destroyer in and take it to the next level in ballistic missile defense. We’ll be pushing those out.”

Ultimately, if the sequestration caps become the new norm, Greenert said he and the other service chiefs would recommend a new national defense strategy, one that matches the budget rather than some other greater goal.

He said continued sequestration would deprive the Navy of its ability to simultaneously “defeat an enemy and deny an enemy in another area of the world.”

olson.wyatt@stripes.com Twitter: @WyattWOlson

author picture
Wyatt Olson is based in the Honolulu bureau, where he has reported on military and security issues in the Indo-Pacific since 2014. He was Stars and Stripes’ roving Pacific reporter from 2011-2013 while based in Tokyo. He was a freelance writer and journalism teacher in China from 2006-2009.

Sign Up for Daily Headlines

Sign up to receive a daily email of today's top military news stories from Stars and Stripes and top news outlets from around the world.

Sign Up Now