'Things could be tense' for soldiers in Kosovo
U.N. to decide province's future national status
The latest rotation of U.S. troops to Kosovo will take charge of keeping the peace in the province just before it could become independent from Serbia, which is loath to let it go.
What happens after that isn’t clear.
“It could be tense,” said Brig. Gen. Douglas Earhart, commander of the Army National Guard’s 29th Infantry Division and new commander of Kosovo Forces Multi-National Task Force (East). “Political leaders I’ve talked to here express the same concern: ‘Things could be tense.’
“We’re urging everyone to be patient.”
Earhart’s unit of some 1,500 soldiers — mostly Guard troops from Virginia, Massachusetts, 20 other states and Puerto Rico — is the eighth U.S. troop rotation to take part in a larger NATO mission working there.
Now the United Nations, which has administered the mostly Albanian province since a NATO bombing campaign expelled Serb forces in 1999, is poised to decide Kosovo’s status.
It delayed a recommendation on the matter last month to avoid inflaming Serbs, who view Kosovo, the center of a medieval Serbian state that fell to the Ottoman Turks in the 1300s, as their homeland. The Serbs will be voting for new leaders next month.
“Kosovo’s ethnic Albanian government and Serbia remain ‘diametrically opposed’ in their views of the future status of the Serbian province … ,” a U.N. news release stated last week. “Fringe groups and extremists on all sides stand ready to exploit more widespread frustration.”
The U.N.’s delay led to some 2,000 Albanian Kosovars demanding independence to “attack U.N. personnel in the capital, Pristina, pulling down a concrete barrier … and hurling concrete blocks and an incendiary device at police officers within,” the release said.
The event could foreshadow further difficulties.
When the mission started, the U.S. troops that were sent to Kosovo to keep the peace between Kosovar Albanians and Serbs following brutal fighting and claims of ethnic cleansing were Germany-based soldiers from the 1st Infantry and 1st Armored divisions.
But after 2001, when the U.S. went to war in Afghanistan then in Iraq, USAREUR’s active-duty soldiers were deployed to those war zones. The Kosovo peacekeeping mission was turned over to the National Guard.
“They gave it to the Guard on recruiting and retention grounds,” said John Pike, director of GlobalSecurity.org, a Web site that provides information on defense, space, intelligence and homeland security.
“Any active-duty unit sent to Kosovo would mean a Guard unit sent to Iraq, and spending a year in Iraq is not why people join the National Guard. Whereas spending a year in scenic Kosovo might not be so bad.”
That’s generally been true. According to Maj. Paul Pecena, spokesman for the 36th Infantry Division, which is just finishing its yearlong Kosovo deployment this week, the unit’s biggest challenge was forming a brigade-sized team out of soldiers from a variety of units — National Guard, Reserve and some active-duty — from the U.S. and six other countries.
“That’s a lot of moving parts," Pecena wrote in an e-mail.
Daily duties were carried out without the need of body armor or Kevlar and consisted of patrols in Humvees or on foot.
“We also had soldiers out in the communities assigned to Liaison and Monitoring Teams,” Pecena wrote. “Their job was to interact with the local government and talk to folks out on the street to see what their concerns were, then help them find a solution.”
But the protest in Pristina is likely a sign of further unrest — and worse, according to a private intelligence firm called Stratfor, which is based in Austin, Texas, and is sometimes called a “shadow CIA.”
“Protests like those of Nov. 28 are likely to be repeated — often — until the United Nations finally cuts Kosovo loose,” according to a Stratfor report titled “Kosovo: The Next Yugoslav War.”
“And that is when things will get interesting — and probably bloody.”
“Three months from now, if Kosovo doesn’t have independence, the Albanians will rise up against the U.N. forces,” said Peter Zeihan, a Stratfor senior analyst.
On the other hand, if the U.N. does grant Kosovo independence, the Serbs will react, he said.
“Their national identity is wrapped up in Kosovo,” Zeihan said. “They’re [angry] enough that the Albanians are living there.”
And according to the Stratfor report, “With most of the West’s deployable forces bogged down in Afghanistan and Iraq — the question is much starker: Can NATO and/or the United States even attempt to counter what will likely be near-simultaneous Serbian moves in Bosnia, Montenegro and Kosovo?”
Stratfor’s worst-case scenario is not universally shared.
“The Serbs invading again? I just don’t see how that’s going to happen,” Pike said. “They saw what happened last time they did that. And anybody who thinks the U.S. is bogged down in Iraq isn’t paying attention. The Army has its hands full, and the Marines have their hands full. But the U.S. Air Force isn’t doing squat over there.”
Earhart, too, said he doubts violence will erupt in his area on his watch. “The average Kosovo citizen wants to get on with it,” Earhart said. “They want to have a job, take their kids to school, lead normal lives. Once [Kosovo’s] status is out there, whatever it is, I think you’ll have some movement” in progress and foreign investment.