Activists see deception in night arrivals at Walter Reed
Shielding wounded denies cost of war, say vigil attendees By Jon R. Anderson, Stars and Stripes Mideast edition, Thursday, March 31, 2005

Jon Anderson / S&S
Holding candles and placards, a group of activists stand vigil in front of
the entrance to Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington, protesting what
they believe is the Pentagon’s attempt to hide war casualties by only bringing
the wounded in at night.
|
WASHINGTON — Steeling against rain and cold night air, clutching candles and
placards, a group of activists are standing nightly vigils at the entrance to
Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington, protesting what they believe is
the Pentagon’s attempt to hide the human toll of the war in Iraq.
With wounded troops arriving from Germany, where most receive treatment after
being stabilized in the field, flights to the United States are arranged so that
soldiers are admitted into Walter Reed for follow on care at night.
“When we first heard about this, we were appalled,” said vigil organizer Gael
Murphy, part of nationwide grass roots women’s group dubbed Code Pink. “Why are
they bringing them in only at night? Is it because they don’t want the media to
cover it? Is it because they don’t want Americans to see the real cost of this
war?”
No, say military officials.
“Night arrivals are beneficial to the patient, as they allow for a regular
night of sleep, and then for doctors in Europe to make final determination on
their ability to make the long flight, move patients from Landstuhl Regional
Medical Center, Germany, to Ramstein Air Base, Germany, and board the plane,”
wrote Walter Reed spokeswoman Lyn Kurkal, in a prepared statement.
Pentagon spokesman Col. Gary Keck said the arrival times were simply a matter
of Air Force scheduling.
A spokesman for Air Mobility Command cited operating restrictions and patient
processing in Germany.
Injured troops arrive at Andrews Air Force Base on Aeromedical Evacuation
channel missions aboard C-141 Starlifter aircraft.
“These missions are scheduled to depart Ramstein in compliance with airfield
operational restrictions and allow patients a restful night before the long
trans-Atlantic flight,” the spokesman said in a written response to Stars and
Stripes questions.
“The Defense Department has been nothing but forthcoming in reporting the
cost of war,” said Jim Turner, another Pentagon spokesman, pointing to press
releases on every servicemember killed, plus daily updates on numbers of
wounded.
According to a Monday press release from Walter Reed, the hospital has
treated 3,985 patients from Operation Iraqi Freedom since the war began, 1,050
of whom have been battle casualties.
But statistics and press releases are one thing, say the activists, the
reality of burns and missing limbs quite another.
The activists say the practice seems too much like the White House ban on the
filming of honor cordons repatriating war dead to U.S. soil in flag-draped
coffins.
“The guys in here are the real cost of the war,” says George Taylor, a former
Navy officer and veteran of the 1962 Cuban Blockade, shrugging off the night
cold among about two dozen activists outside the Walter Reed gates Tuesday
night.
“It’s just shameful that the military would try and sneak them in like this
and hope no one notices their wounds,” he adds, as a red minivan sporting a
“Support our troops” yellow ribbon passes by. The driver honks the horn, yelling
“We support you!” to the activists.
Kevin McCarron, a former Marine intelligence specialist and a veteran of the
1991 Gulf War, said he thinks the late-night admittances are a dishonor to the
troops.
“They should be feted as they arrive, honored as heroes, not slipped through
the back door like this,” he said.
|