storyhdr.gif (5510 bytes)

Friday, September 28, 2001

Security experts in Europe to help
local commanders protect their bases

Experts testing base security in Europe this week hope to help local commanders protect against terrorists.

Part of the Joint Staff Integrated Vulnerability Assessment program, the teams are one of Department of Defense’s most important tools to combat terrorism, Brig. Gen. Johnathan Cofer told the House Armed Services Committee in June.

"Our challenge is to anticipate the threat and take appropriate countermeasures," said Cofer, deputy director of the Joint Chiefs of Staff office for combating terrorism.

Although the Joint Staff Integrated Vulnerability Assessment teams’ checks in Europe were no doubt scheduled long before the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, the military avoided commenting on force protection. Officials at U.S. European Command, responsible for security of U.S. personnel in 91 countries in Europe and Africa, would confirm only that a team currently is in Germany.

Sources close to the assessment said teams arrived Monday in Hanau, Germany, after spending last week in Vicenza, Italy. Hanau military officials would not elaborate on the survey.

Since the attacks, armed soldiers poked mirrors under car hoods and scrutinized military identification. Troops rummaged trough car trunks, asking soldiers and family members to step from their cars to open bags and packages. After that, Pond’s Security guards duplicated their efforts, creating traffic jams outside bases.

Now that strict force protection measures subsided this week, questions about safety are raised.

Are the bases in Europe safe from terrorism? Are there weaknesses?

That’s what Joint Staff Integrated Vulnerability Assessment teams will find out this week. But the public is not likely to learn the results because then terrorists also could find out, military officials said.

The teams were formed in 1997 after the June 25, 1996, terrorist attack on the U.S. military complex of Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia, killing 19 airmen and injuring hundreds. Working in groups of seven, each member has a different specialty, to include security operations, structural engineering, operational readiness and terrorist options. While each survey is unique, teams normally examine a base’s ability to collect intelligence, its physical security measures, and any infrastructure vulnerabilities.

They also look at how a base can respond to a terrorist incident. Terrorists are more likely to attack a base with a large explosive, Cofer said. So teams look at perimeter security, controlled access and plans to react should a terrorist succeed in creating damage.

Normally teams spend five days on the ground, observing everyday base practices and conducting interviews. When the teams complete their survey, they brief the base command staff and key community members on any security problems and offer solutions. The team gives the base a written report within 45 days.

Six teams, working under the Defense Threat Reduction Agency, scope military bases for security problems. By June 2001, they surveyed 372 bases, Cofer said.

"We will complete approximately 45 additional JSIVAs by the end of this calendar year," Cofer said.

Military officials at all levels refused to comment on the team’s work. Requests for information about the teams began at the base support battalion level and floated to the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who were also reluctant to talk.


Back to September stories
Page Two news roundup
Stories from August, 2001
Stories from July, 2001
Stories from June, 2001
Stories from May, 2001
Stories from April, 2001
Stories from March, 2001
Stories from February,2001
Stories from January, 2001
Stories from December, 2000
Stories from November, 2000
Stories from October, 2000
Stories from August and September, 2000
Stories from June and July, 2000
Home