Lawmakers want $6.7 billion
for
military needs not covered in budgetBy Lisa Burgess
Washington bureau
WASHINGTON
Without an emergency infusion of $6.7 billion, the U.S. military will face critical
shortages in training and flying hours, force protection, aircraft and ship maintenance,
and other vital areas between now and October, according to a group of U.S. lawmakers.
Rep. Norm
Dicks, D-Wash., a 22-year veteran of the House Defense Appropriations Subcommittee, asked
for $6.7 billion to pay for increased costs of military pay and housing, fuel, maintenance
and other needs not covered in the budget.
Included in
the $6.7 billion supplemental appropriations bill are:
A total
of $4.3 billion for things such as training and flying hours, force protection, aircraft
and ship maintenance, and fuel-cost increases. This total includes $181 million for
recruiting and retention costs; $869 million for flying-hour programs; $558 million for
spare parts, $667 million for urgent aircraft and ship maintenance needs, including fully
funding the repairs on the U.S.S. Cole.
$110
million to offset the impact of energy price increases on military family housing.
$1
billion for unanticipated health-care cost increases.
$1
billion for pay and housing allowances.
$405
million for pay increases mandated by the FY 2001 Defense Authorization Bill.
$276
million for Basic Allowance for Housing, to fully fund the 2001 rates.
"The
amounts included in this bill slightly more than 2 percent of the defense budget
are only what is urgently needed to cover unexpected cost increases for the most
basic needs of our servicemembers through the end of this fiscal year," Dicks said in
a statement introducing the legislation on Feb. 13.
In the
past, presidents usually ask for this mid-year funding. This year, however, President
George W. Bush announced he will not ask for the money until Defense Secretary Donald
Rumsfeld completes a review of the Pentagons strategy and programs.
Rumsfeld
has not revealed a game plan for the reviews completion. In the meantime, however,
the services are rapidly draining the last of their 2001 budget in several categories.
On Jan. 10,
the service chiefs met privately with members of the Senate Armed Services Committee to
discuss specific areas that will experience shortfalls if a supplemental appropriations
bill is not passed.
The
individual lists of service needs for 2001 were never made public; in fact, since the
January visit, the services have been ordered by Rumsfeld not to speak about budget issues
at all until the overall review is complete, a military source close to the process said.
"We
have been given explicit direction to stand back and not get involved," one source
said on condition of anonymity. "Its been made clear to us that when the Bush
administration wants our opinion about budget matters, they will let us know."
But the
service chiefs have not gone unheard by Dicks, who used their lists as the basis for his
bill, according to the congressmans press secretary, George Behan.
"We
put major pieces of their requests in the supplemental bill," Behan said.
Dicks
decided not to include about $1 billion worth of the service requests because, in his
judgment, those items were not "truly critical," Behan said.
In addition
to Dicks, several other key members of Congress from defense-related committees have
signed their names to the supplemental bill, including Armed Services Committee ranking
Democrat Ike Skelton, Mo.; Rep. Norman Sisisky, D-Va.; Rep. Martin Frost, D-Texas; Rep.
Chet Edwards, D-Texas; and Rep. Ellen Tauscher, D-Calif.
Back to February's stories
Page Two news roundup
Stories from January, 2001
Stories from December, 2000
Stories from November, 2000
Stories from October, 2000
Stories from August and September, 2000
Stories from June and July, 2000
Home |