storyhdr.gif (5510 bytes)

Monday, August 27, 2001

When it comes to retaining NCOs,
Army’s V Corps comes out on top

vcorp827.jpg (13769 bytes)
Photo courtesy of U.S. Army

Capt. Donovan A. Rickel swears in. Spec. Octavio Nuņez, who said he re-upped in Germany because he wanted to stay in Europe longer. Nuņez, a mechanical infantryman with Headquarters Company, 1st Battalion, 26th Infantry, expects to deploy to the Balkans.

The fact that the Army needs to keep its best non-commissioned officers is nothing new.

The Army is watching V Corps closely because it seems better at retaining its NCOs than any other corps.

This should comes as no surprise to V Corps officials. V Corps beat out the other three Army corps last year.

But the oddity may be the reason why so many soldiers sign up for another tour. They list real-world deployments as their No. 1 reason, according to retention officials.

“I know it sounds crazy, but we always see an influx of re-enlistments whenever we deploy,” said Army Staff Sgt. Douglas Goodwin, retention non-commissioned officer for 2nd Brigade, 1st Infantry Division in Wuerzburg, Germany.

Besides owning the highest retention percentages, V Corps also boasts the highest deployment rate of the four Army corps, although retention officials say there is also a strong emphasis from top to bottom in retaining quality soldiers.

“This has become pretty much a trend over here,” said Master Sgt. Lyle Hogue, senior retention operations non-commissioned officer for V Corps.

Top Army officials have targeted three main groups for retention officials to chart: initial term, mid-career and fiscal year special mission soldiers.

Initial term soldiers are those within their first enlistment and are usually considered to be the most difficult to keep.

Retention percentages during for the first three quarters of fiscal 2001 give V Corps a commanding lead over the others.

Mid-career soldiers are those who have reenlisted at least once and have served up to 10 years.

The special mission category is a new Army push designed to target soldiers in the previous two categories scheduled to end their time in service within the fiscal year.

After the first 10 years, soldiers sign an indefinite contract that will last until retirement.

Army Spc. Octavio Nuņez served his first tour at Fort Carson, Colo., in a unit under III Corps, and said Germany is the place to be. He has served 18 months in Germany and reenlisted Aug. 3 to stay longer.

“I get more training than in Carson, and we’re real close,” Nuņez said about his unit. “Being away from our families, we’re more prone to stick together and form a family. And the leadership I have is real good. I can trust them with my life and they can trust me with theirs.”

The mechanized infantryman currently works as a driver for the top non-commissioned officer in 1st Battalion, 26th Infantry. Although he has not actually deployed since arriving to Germany, Nuņez said that will soon change. He goes back to his original job and then on to the Balkans with his unit early next year.

A stronger emphasis in senior NCO involvement at every level of retention has helped keep quality soldiers in, especially sergeants and staff sergeants, according to Hogue.

Hogue said the command could start training with the Air Force to develop fresh ideas. Even the V Corps commander, Lt. Gen. William S. Wallace, is on board, according to Hogue.

Today’s senior NCOs are the total package, Hogue said. They are tops in their personal and professional lives and are at the highest education levels in the Army’s history.

“These senior NCOs are highly competitive; they could be out in the business world, competing for and taking top jobs, but they’re not,” Hogue said. “They are very committed to the Army. Soldiers see that.”


Back to August stories
Page Two news roundup
Stories from July, 2001
Stories from June, 2001
Stories from May, 2001
Stories from April, 2001
Stories from March, 2001
Stories from February,2001
Stories from January, 2001
Stories from December, 2000
Stories from November, 2000
Stories from October, 2000
Stories from August and September, 2000
Stories from June and July, 2000
Home